Funds for the arts Essay

In a world that thrives on science, the neglect of the humanities is somewhat uncommon. What is baffling though is that the arts could have societal contributions as well. Some would find it heavy(p) to agree especi every(prenominal)y when some of the people had been driven to think that the scientific breakthroughs would be sufficient enough for their existence. Governments would readily shed some property for the scientific pursuits but were reluctant to shell out some for the arts.It is in my belief then that the fastidious pursuit should be recognized as important. But if the politics were to just shell out some pecuniary resource for the arts that would reflect the majority of the people then this should be ruling twice. The diversity in people would be reason enough for the government to rethink their position. This diversity would not help in pinpointing what the majority rattling wants.Besides, it was said that the government funding could lead the arts to become res istless (Radbourn). If people were to focus much on the majority then the artistic input would not be an artistic input at all but an input for the governments satisfaction. The government should fund the arts but they should not give out rigid demands that only the utter of the majority would be reflected. Funding the arts could have considerable outcomes. humanistic discipline could affect the educational system since it would help learning become much interesting, it could also preserve the culture, it could have economic benefits (arts plus industry), and many more ( arts Funding). The rigid demand for the majority then could not help portray other ideas that may become essential and/or helpful in the near future. It would seem that funding the arts with such rigid demand for reflecting only the majority of the people would mean that the occult motives are for the profit that the art would bring.Most artists frown upon those who would use their creativeness and label it ar t for the benefit of the fame and money that they allow receive. In fact, it will only be an exhaustive task where its sincerity is highly questionable. workings CitedArts Funding. 2002. August 22 2007. . Radbourn, Jennifer. How Government Funding of the Arts Kills Leadership and Creativity. August 22 2007. .